Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jake's avatar

DMB - you left out one of the sneakiest BS types - where someone speaks the whole truth, or mostly truth, and either does so in an utterly unconvincing way - possibly intentionally - or casts it as coming from a known or presumed unreliable source. So the Onion or the Babylon Bee are usually :-) recognized as satire... but a *factual* report falsely attributed to either would be largely disbelieved. Then there's stacking good with bad... if "parable" comes from para-bolos -"to be thrown alongside" (one easier meaning alongside a harder one), you might call the intentional bad apple spoiling the whole barrelful as "parabull". A report says A, B, C, and D that I can't confirm or deny, and also says Z which I know to be false. So in my mind, A-D become probably false too :-).

Which makes *everything* in *any* newspaper or media report potentially suspect, if one has ever seen egregious errors in some report that one was really knowledgeable on. Common enough. Which comedian/columnist was it who was lambasted by a woman who was giving him down the road for everything she had against newspapers ever and against some recent article in specific (just a convenient nearby target, he was)? He let her rant a while, and when she took a breath, he stopped her and said "Lady. It costs a quarter."

Logical fallacies can be so fun :-).

Expand full comment

No posts